UFOs and AARO and the Future of Disclosure

Author Avatar

Cristina Gomez

Joined: Mar 2024
Spread the love

UFOs and AARO and the Future of Disclosure


In this episode of Mysteries with a History, we take a deep dive into the recent UFO Report by AARO, the reaction and fallout, as well as a look at the possible future of Disclosure. On March the 8th, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office’s (AARO) Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous…

source

Reviews

0 %

User Score

0 ratings
Rate This

Sharing

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

41 Comments

  1. Kept Observing Nonsense About
    Big Lit Uaps… Exasperating !

    Just a try at an acronym for the Kirkpatrick mention of KONA BLUE… maybe dont use this if you file a Freedom of Info request

  2. Ross Coulthart has a new @NewsNation show REALITY CHECK; his first guest was Danny Sheehan. Here are two attorneys discussing the AARO report. Sheehan minced no words. Executive order 12333 bans covert action by the intelligence Community against the American public with willfully misleading media campaigns or influence campaigns. There is direct evidence that this executive order is being breached. When Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick presented his report on 3/8/24, he outright lied. It is now up to Congress to hold Kirkpatrick and AARO accountable for their lies.

  3. Such a great analysis Cristina and Jimmy! Repeatedly claiming something was a 'misidentification, misunderstanding, misinterpretation and misconstrued' without evidence doesn't make it true… it makes it propaganda

  4. Regarding page 11 and the statements that the US has investigated all and has no evidence of “off world“ technology., You must keep in mind they are completely accurate yes, in fact they know that this advanced technology has come from an advanced civilizationThat however extraterrestrial it originally was now dwells below the oceans! They know what they’re doing, they know how to word everything. It is we have to do all the work to figure out the truth.

  5. Hello Christina and Jimmy, it amazes me how AARO built up the interview prior to the agreed upon time to start and agreement of info. At completion what to expect, what they expect and to standby for further communication. You are part of history was told, never a copy of report or any further communication since, 4hrs and 19 min, 3/22/24.

  6. if it takes more than one page to describe whats been seen then it is just a storymy sighting i wrote down happened two days ago not 40 yrs ago i dont need to hear old storys what i want to see is the latest sightings that dont come from the government because they can not be trusted

  7. If you were an alien civilization "visiting" a remote planet, wouldnt you also make use of the local resources including mining minerals, elements and using advanced techniques to turn them into "objects" of use. In some cases investigation of the atomic elements may indeed prove they are of earthly origin, at the same time it does not mean the resulting object was human made.. There are cases where ufo/uap have been observed to drop apparently metalic "waste" as liquid garbage then fly away. It has also been observed that mining activities have occurred around some of the ufo/uap hot spots. A series of events related to volcanic activities and "strange lights" seen interacting with the volcanoes raises some questions. The "potential" underwater activities also seem to be close to tectonic plate junctions where elements could potentially be more abundant

  8. 0:11: 👽 Discussion on recent UFO disclosure and future implications, with a humorous twist.
    8:02: 👽 Investigation into USG UFO reports lacks transparency and detail.
    15:03: 👽 Unidentified UFO sightings not included in historical perspective report, raising suspicion of deliberate omission.
    22:10: 🛸 Discussion on lack of names and confidentiality agreements in a UFO report.
    29:33: 👽 Investigation into claims of alien technology sightings and social impact study requested by the White House.
    36:24: 👽 Analysis of a delayed report raises questions about accountability and credibility.
    43:53: 👽 Unveiling a secretive government project related to global technology, sparking curiosity and speculation.
    50:54: 🛸 Complexities of government compartmentalization hinder access to information on UFOs, raising questions about true disclosure.
    57:26: 👽 Investigation into the removal of Malibu base, previously covered extensively in various media forms.
    1:04:42: 👽 Analysis of misinformation in research reports and conspiracy theories online.
    1:11:40: 👽 Government UFO investigations lack consistency and purpose.
    1:18:28: 👽 Critics claim Arrow is part of a government cover-up of extraterrestrial existence without evidence or willingness to engage in dialogue.
    1:26:13: 👽 The impact of the recently published UFO report on disclosure and transparency is deemed insignificant by experts and viewers.

    Timestamps by Tammy AI

  9. When God made us he never told us about his side jobs. Aliens… How can we expect any government to do the same. What is so terrifying they have to hide it. Maybe it is better we don't know…

  10. Most of the statements made about anything of substance in this report state that the UAP/UFO are not extraterrestrial. Perhaps those in the know believe they are actually from earth.

  11. Does the report mention any of the new science being done that shows that UAP are possible, just not by us? They use culture to tell us this could be wrong but don't use science to say where it isn't.

    It's so hard not to hate the US.

  12. Surely AARO have now done themselves out of a job! This was a very interesting and informative discussion thank you, I have been waiting a long time for this. However, if I had written this stuff at Uni it would have been a fail and would have had to resubmit it all over again! Reading between the lines one thing that strikes me is that the findings are not final almost being non-committal in nature, It also does not rule out the possibility of an interdimensional phenomenon. In my opinion, this report is so worthless that I would not bother to print it, shred it and put it on my compost heap! I cannot tell you how disappointed I am in this report but to be honest I did not expect anything else. The whole reason that there are so many witnesses, books, films, TV shows, YouTube shows, Blogs, investigators etc etc is because there really is something going on.

  13. I'm happy AARO doubled down on denying it all. I think we'll see more whistleblowers come forward now as we saw in the Ross Coultharts interview with Daniel Sheehan. If you watched the Sol Foundations symposium you see there is going to be some serious investigation happening that is outsides the Pentagons control. AARO is irrelevant if you ask me.

  14. The report is missing many sections a true professional would have included. Where is the page heading announcing the REFERENCES that should precede the actual reference entries themselves which start on page 46.
    The adhoc structure and paragraph formation along with associated wording suggests to me the author has collected snippets from others who have basically told him what to say. Its a copy & paste effort. a clear FAIL. Christina, bottom of page 8 top of page 9, when one fails to comprehend the reasoning behind something then one cannot make any assumptions about normality .
    Page 6: [ ARROs mission is similar to these earlier organizations ]…. ahh Blue Book – a BS front, Condon- a BS front… I agree, it certainly is similar.

  15. My big problem with the report is that it ignores all the reports from before there was any awareness of UFOs in the social mentality or in any form of social media. They are trying to act like there were no UFO sightings before TV and the Internet. They ignore the fact that NO ONE was talking about UFOs before Roswell. So where was tiktok in 1947 to blame on that event. Roswell started all of this as far as public awareness. Before that event public awareness was very low.
    And the fact that they get names and dates wrong in the report tells me that the writer did not even go back and read these reports. They probably just got the cliff notes from someone who just skimmed through the documents and didn't pay attention to what they were reading. The whole report is an outright lie intended to be read by people who are not informed on the topic. This report is not for people who have been following this topic for years and knows the reports and events and details. It's written for people who get all of their information from social media. And lets face it. Social media is giving a bad reputation to the people following the topic seriously. You can sum up the whole word salad report in one sentence. "Stop believing what you see on the Internet.". That is literally the statement they are making.

  16. if i may, remmeber that pushing nuclear beautiful human now will become et a lke coz human survivor will live undergroung and develop big eyes etc pls pls no no pushing of nuclear war ty