Vacant seats controversy: Supreme Court hears speaker's response
Vacant seats controversy: Supreme Court hears speaker's response
Vacant seats controversy: Supreme Court hears speaker’s response
source
Reviews
0 %
This is a demo advert, you can use simple text, HTML image or any Ad Service JavaScript code. If you're inserting HTML or JS code make sure editor is switched to 'Text' mode.
The whole constitution needs a review. Supreme Court judges must not be appointed by the president. It doesn't help anyone
Looks like the CJ panel is guiding the 1st and 2nd defendants on what and how to respond to the applicant’s case. Also allowing them unreasonably more speaking time that allowed the applicant. Not sure why though and whether that is ethically permissible
Wow
THE PARTY WITH INTENTIONS AND NOT FORCE OR MINDS AND NOT MIGHTY.
They will surely change it when jesus comes 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
How do we know an MP has left his party without reference to the particular MP's Political Party's Constitution?
We shouldn't be hypocrite and dishonest in our engagements; for whatever a man sows, he shall reap.
Not trust in this current Supreme Court justices .
And can't be rely on
The supreme Court in this generation is not trusted
The court clerks don't seem to be interested in whats happening in court. Very poor body language. Not good for the cameras.
My dear youth need to respect accomplished persons.You can make your point without an insult.
Useless unanimous.. what CI said those Mps supposed to be heard before rulling as vacant.. Baseless argument in court wasting time.. greedy bcus of their looting of borrowing last minute before leaving power . Shame. Are they also faithful to their constituency that gave them the mandate on their ticket
We know the ruling already
so they wont stop wearing these nonsense on their head 😂😂😂
I don't know why they're wasting time because we all know the ruling already unanimous
These unanimous FC
When will they stop wearing this colonial Brazilian hair ? 😂😂