SHOCK MOMENT: Anti-DEI Witness Sounds Off After Fiery Clash With Jamie Raskin

Author Avatar

Forbes Breaking News

Joined: Mar 2024
Spread the love

SHOCK MOMENT: Anti-DEI Witness Sounds Off After Fiery Clash With Jamie Raskin


At yesterday’s House Oversight Committee hearing, Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier (Ret.) sounded off on DEI and wokeness after a brutal exchange with Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) about the renaming of bases.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories,…

source

Reviews

0 %

User Score

0 ratings
Rate This

Sharing

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

42 Comments

  1. To hell with duty, if your outside of Gods natural order of man and woman I ain’t gonna mess with it. Guidance is needed to get rid of this nonsense along with racial supremacy and everything else. Go study constitutional law and see how direct they were against all of this stuff.

  2. Raskin is disgusting and really needs to go. His smirks and BS should not be a part of our politics. Thank you Lt. Col. Lohmeier. Your wisdom and commonsense is needed in our government.

  3. These weasels actually politicize the military by their own efforts. To become "senior leadership" in the Mil your politics must coincide with such crap as DEI or you'll NOT get the promotion your military expertise and devotion deserves

  4. When it comes to dealing with Jamie Raskin, it should be standard practice that a tape loop should be playing "don't bullshit me" whenever he opens his mouth.

  5. I bet Raskin's pucker factor was pegged when LT. COL. Lohmeier told them their ideology didn't matter one bit. This is one of t he finest dress downs to a bunch of moron congressmen I have ever heard. Tip of the hat to LT. COL. Lohmeier!! Raskin couldn't carry his water.

  6. It is sad that so many in congress have never served in uniform, and they know nothing about the organization they seek to change, yet they pompously sit in Congress and cram down changes that harm the military based on their political views not what is good for national defense. I served twenty two years in the Army, in Peace and War. My first base of assignment was Fort Hood, TX. John Bell Hood was a Confederate General who led units for the Confederacy in the Civil War. I proudly served at Fort Hood as my first duty, and when I was there I was not concerned with what General Hood did in the Civil War, I was concerned with learning my MOS skills to carry out my oath of service and when promoted to leadership, I was concerned with training my soldiers so that they could do their duty. I served with soldiers who were of all races and sexual orientations, and I did not care one bit about any of that, I cared that they did their jobs in an excellent manner. None of us who serve gave a damn about who the base we were at was named after. We did care about the leaders of the past, not in relation to the posts named after them, but because of their actions both before and after the Civil War. Some of the Officers of that time were great leaders and made this nation better by their actions, General Thomas Jackson (Fort Jackson), was a military academy instructor who produced many fine leaders. General Braxton Bragg (Ft Bragg) was an incompetent leader who lost many battles after his men had already won them. General Ulysses S. Grant was a slave owner, and yet he was elected President of the United States. General George A. Custer never had a fort named after him, and he was considered by many to be a bungler because he led his unit into a massacre, yet during the Civil War, his unit's lone action saved the Union Army at the battle of Gettysburg when he took his Michigan Cavalry and intercepted J.E.B. Stuarts Cavalry which was en route to attacking General Hancock’s Army from the rear at the same time that General George Pickett was enacting his charge on the front of the Union Army, had Custer not acted it is highly probable that Pickett’s Charge would have been successful and the Civil War could have gone in a victory for the Confederacy. Who is politicizing the base name changes?? The Executive and Legislative Branches are Politicizing the name changes, Both party’s are doing it.

  7. Abortion is not healthcare – "gender affirming care" in not Care – trans surgery is not Healthcare.

    Democrats use their own language and definitions in an attempt to make it sound more palatable to the general Public