Senzo Meyiwa murder trial I Kelly Khumalo named again in trial
Senzo Meyiwa murder trial I Kelly Khumalo named again in trial
Singer Kelly Khumalo’s name has been mentioned a few times in the Senzo Meyiwa murder trial.
The confessions which were admitted into evidence after a marathon trial within a trial allege that the accused were paid by Khumalo to take part in the murder.
This has raised a lot of questions.
Dubazana Attorneys, Nthabiseng Dubazana joins us for an…
source
Reviews
0 %
@clantisdumakude isn't this interesting coming from a law persons….☺️☺️
The second case was brought about as a cold case, mna correct me if im wrong, i thiink a cold case is a case that has not been finalized and it is allocated to a new person for a fresh perspective into the matter.
Kelly is being protected from above no doubt
Pre meditated murder. Even a song was released before the lil baby's dad was killed.
That's why the first judge is being impishly
Nthabiseng Dubazana only telling the truth ❤
The judge behaves like a prosecutor and a state witness
And Kelly Khumalo is implicated in cas 636 but she is not in the dock,if Kelly is being protected by law of confession then the same law must protect accused 3,4 and 5
#TeffoBackOnTheCase
It is started when he said ratha , I dont want people said nginigwebele esakeni. Sentence was already there before giving heads of judgement
I doubt they will call Nthabiseng again because she is still upholding the ethics
Finally we have a legal practitioner who talks abt how the preciding officer and NPA have messed up the case. It seems like their intention is to make the case so murky that we end up not knowing the truth & lies. Pretoria high court once sealed statements without a hearing or trial and now a retired judge was called for a very important case of a national team captain. Who gave the docket to cold cases while it was still investigated by the 4 guys appointed by the commissioner. Very interesting events while the family of the deceased is still trying to find closure. Sad situation.
I love u nthabiseng a brave woman like you
Her name has been mentioned several times yet she's not arrested… that is South Africa.
Exceptions on Kelly n friends n things are changed, bulls***t
He is a prosecutor indeed and it is so sad to witness such shocking behaviors from a judge
Rathas with 50 expirients on the other side he receive million from Kelly He fail to call all those were in Voslo to testified ge just against Ntanzi . ThisbOld man silly .🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🙏🙏🙏🙏🎂
Let's hope SABC will retain you sisi. We don't Mr Hart anymore cause he also tells it like it is..
Well said Nthabi 🤜🏿🙏🏽
Big ups to your my sister we need people like you mtakababa.
Nthabiseng thank you so much for yo comment you are the 2nd person who speak nothing but the truth we as public we are watching how the power people it to poor lame people…corruption that is taking place…even for Tefo we are watching..I am scared SoutAfrika
I think is was you last interview mthabisang by this channels but thank you for you truthful of your analysis and your objectivity thank you
yhaaa its true this guys will be sentenced and after tefu said i doubt that kelley will go to jail
Brave woman fir calling spade a spade 😂😂Ratha all eyes are on you.
But why is the wife kept out of the matter, the person who has a serious motive to kill is the wife
First time I'm hearing an analyst that is such objective views and being honest about what is happening in that court
I like her but she seems confused or not aware that Kelly is the alleged mastermind under cas6363. We don't need the second docket (cas375) to prosecute Kelly Khumalo! Dubazane, like all of us, must wait for the conclusion of cas636 – not this thing of casting aspersions against Judge Ratha!
I beg to differ with Nthabiseng . Her explanation is misleading and her understanding of criminal law and criminal proceeding is questionable. The criminal procedure is as follows. The arrest of a person is solely dependent on the evidence against such person. The investigation starts with the reporting of the case to the police, an IO is appointed to investigate, information gathered by the IO is then given to the NPA which then will decide if there is sufficient evidence to can prosecute and if so a trial will start. In this case the evidence that links Kelly is from the confessions of accused 1 and 2, which has to be tested in court if indeed she was or she is involved. I doubt if there is sufficient evidence to can charge Kelly. If it was she should have been charged from the onset. With regard the jurisdiction of the HCs, although they all have the same jurisdiction, the Pretoria HC is Provincial while JHB HC is local HC. U can lodged an appeal against decision of the local HC to Pretoria HC ( provincial) but not the opposite. Appeals against the decision of the Provincial HC are lodged directly to SCA or the CC. Should there be evidence which links Kelly directly to the case , she will be charged and join the other accused .
Well said Nthabi