Senzo Meyiwa murder trial | 15 April 2024

Author Avatar

SABC News

Joined: Mar 2024
Spread the love


Senzo Meyiwa murder trial | 15 April 2024


The Senzo Meyiwa murder trial is set to resume at the High Court in Pretoria.

In the previous court appearance, e-Natis expert Christopher Motlou wrapped up his testimony.

Judge Ratha Mokgatlheng granted a recess so the defence can prepare for the cross-examination.
Five men are on trial for the murder of the Bafana Bafana captain, who was…

source

Reviews

0 %

User Score

0 ratings
Rate This

Sharing

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

43 Comments

  1. So this police officer came to the police station ….went to the cells alone without signing their registers…..finds a cellphone in the cells.. doesn't alert his colleagues…..out of the gate that's that….
    Interesting story to tell your kids when putting them yo bed

  2. When a person is arrested …he is thoroughly searched…meaning this police officer did not do his job ..he took Ntanzi to the cell…did not search him….came back after some time and found a cellphone……
    Mxxxxxmmmmm

  3. The administrative part of matters is not applied microscopically by the defense and all parties affected in this cases. Promptness is lacking which causes unnecessary delays 😢

  4. I allegedly comment on this alleged channel that is allegedly broadcasting the alleged trial of the alleged killing of the alleged goal keeper of the alleged national team

  5. It doesn't make sense they went all the way from Gauteng to mpangeni just because they were told an inmate have cellphone on the cell? The likes of Thabo Baxter have cellphones in prison cells, and there are many prisoners who have cellphones in their cells, they just chose that qalakabusha prison.

  6. This is crap – a waste of time. This shooting happened accidentally while the gun was handled wrongly among the friends. The problem is that the very friends did not disclose that information and now it's 'late ' to do so. One can just see how these saps investigators fail to make sense in their answers.

  7. Be fair bantu enithi niphethe umthetho ,aboRamaphho niyabsvikela u Kellyniyamuvukela iqiniso aninalo ibani neqiniso niyawabona ama thumbu abulala uSenzo why ningawathathi niwagcume ejele njengabanye why niBusy nidla imali yombuso izwe liyalamba okanye anidinwa ukufaka imali phasikwemiCamelo na?yekani ukumosha isouth African

  8. The defense for No2 should thoroughly examine the search procedures conducted when detainees travel to and from courts, as well as the protocols for cell searches and their frequency. By doing so, they can argue that No2 was alone in the police cells and thus could not have concealed a phone undetected for an extended period.

  9. It seems like the judge was emphasizing the importance of the defence proving that the phones in question didn't belong to their clients. However, the defense focused on less important arguments about OB, diaries, and registers, which wasted valuable time.

    The defense for No2 didn't denie the ownership of the phone at all, they accept it. With that comes call logs and tower logs.

    The defense for No5 only mentioned that it belonged to someone else, they missed the opportunity to argue that even if the phone belonged to someone else, it doesn't necessarily mean their clients had access to it. They could have highlighted that the alleged owner didn't allow others to use their phone, but they failed to convey this at all.

  10. This witness ( police officer) I wonder which oath did he took on his official appointment as honest as well as to uphold the official mandate as police, as of now what he first sworn in, he's not understanding to assist the court, His alleged lost or misplaced Personal state diary with crucial information and of great essence in the evidentiary exhibit,, it's just a escape goat. This guy must be arrested to mislead the court, defeating the ends of justice and blatantly lie in the court of law

  11. 1:03:40 Police cells; someone is not telling the truth. So, from June 2020, he was charging in the cells. Traveling with the Mogane & Mabena booked at different Police stations (Phone in the pockets).

    I thought the search the accused during the arrest & and booking, and they take personal belongings for safe keeping.

  12. These people are talking about an EXPERT yet they pronounce it as EXPECT. They must get this right because this case is going somewhere else. Plus the defence talks about the expert's daily cost, will leave Baloyi to "drain" the defence's budget.

  13. Muganu typed d statement 😂😅lies lies u basted gininda gave u 😂bt 1day u will all pay for yo rolls dat u played in d mess we are in fanele niboshwe nonke maka kelly ,gininda,baloi,tumelo,zandi,longwe,mthoko,kelly nalama phoyisa angawenzanga umsebenzi to dis case

  14. South African police officers in this entire country, if any alleged high profile suspect will never be taken to any holding cells without being searched, not a slightly chance

  15. On the issue of the suspects then, now as accused, there is no way police officer can arrest any suspect and taken or kept in any holding cells without being thoroughly bodily searched, if this witness state that he did not confiscate or took the suspects cellphone or any belonging which are not allowed into holding cells, where on earth the suspect arrested and not searched. The issue of the suspect found with cellphone in the holding cell is very suspicious, as he was arrested, searched as he was classified as a high profile suspect, how was he could not being searched for any firearm or any illegal items in his possession. Now I'm definitely convinced this guys before court are habitual hitmen but they are not the correct suspects on the matter before court

  16. the moment the court interjects it disturbs the flow of cross examination, its clear that the police never raised a charge on the accused number 2 for being found with the phone in the cells until the court interjects