It's Topical | Land Debate: Is the Expropriation Act on shaky ground?

Spread the love


It's Topical | Land Debate: Is the Expropriation Act on shaky ground?


The Expropriation Act. Met with mixed reaction. It repeals the pre-democratic Expropriation Act of 1975. It sets out how organs of the State may expropriate land in the public interest for varied reasons.

So basically, it outlines how expropriation can be done and on what basis. Local, provincial and national authorities will use this…

source

Reviews

0 %

User Score

0 ratings
Rate This

Sharing

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Prove your humanity: 6   +   1   =  

21 Comments

  1. I think the time is now for the ANC to return back to the house of Chembur in order to drought a new legislation act of law to implement the expropertion land of law lawfully In a court of law "Remember during the previlage error" Black majority was removed from their territories by using lateral force without any negotiation " when I pull up my horse string and look at my rior mirror I see an autograph of an white minority which called them selves the right winger in their foreign country of black societies and demanding what so called title did that was never exist during the time of operation ruling government in White's first monopoly basically they entered the border of South Africa as a whole unlawfully without producing their passports they started to demand passports from us which we didn't have during that period

  2. I've been hearing people say" in the interest of the people" a lot when it comes to land issues, no political party bothered to interview people about what is it they truly want though. The DA is the gate keeper of native Africans progress.

  3. When the bloed from your veins returns to the sea and the dust from your bones returns to the earth will you realise that the land didnot belong to you but you rather belong to the land. Shaka Zulu

  4. I think one should also look at the following:
    1) Did you obtain land after 1994?
    2) Many of land/property owners obtain their land/property through hard word, saving and be responsible.
    3) The goverment own huge amount of land but they do not use it.
    4) Listen the black people earn high salary through their high posts, in contrast to white people who earning low salaries because they do not qualify for higher ranking post because of skin color. But still white people try to uplift themselves even with all challenges.
    5) Lastly why on earth do black people hammer on apartheid? Many of those lands where bought from tribes either for a service rendered, exchanges of goods and valuable. Now many years on, their descendants whish to believe lies being told about stollen land, very few were relocated and mostly in the cape province. Some times I wish people would rather obtain truth than listening to all this properganda.
    Politicians alike just want your vote to line their pockets, people you must wake up.
    6) Many a white Afrikaner have obtain property with hard work and edurance after 1994 and nothing was handed down to them.
    Go look at the Eastern Cape which have land stretching for kilometers

  5. These land was there before Ramaphosa lead the country there was n problems, only solution here is that move Ramaphosa the cause of sell our country to foreigners. He control even the law .

  6. These land was there before Ramaphosa lead the country there was n problems, only solution here is that move Ramaphosa the cause of sell our country to foreigners. He control even the law .

  7. This is a joke, europeans take land and send kitchen girl to argue their position. You must have a shame as an Afrikan doing all these for 30 coins. People died and boldly represent european position without any iota of shame!

  8. cyril's planf for white people of south africa has ALWAYS been to DESTROY them.
    he SAID so HIMSELF.

    Dr Mario Oriani-Ambrosini, who died in 2014, was a constitutional lawyer who became an MP. He was also a key adviser to Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi both during the negotiations and afterwards when the latter was minister of home affairs in the governments of national unity. His memoirs – the Prince and I: A South African Institutional Odyssey – are published this year by his estate.

    According to the memoirs, Mr Ramaphosa, "stood head and shoulders above his colleagues" in the African National Congress (ANC) as well as above the National Party's negotiators. He was a "born leader" and a "straight shooter". Nor did he ever lie or "misrepresent anything".

    What then are we to make of this paragraph in Dr Oriani-Ambrosini's intriguing memoirs?

    "In his brutal honesty, Ramaphosa told me of the ANC's 25-year strategy to deal with the whites: it would be like boiling a frog alive, which is done by raising the temperature very slowly. Being cold-blooded, the frog does not notice the slow temperature increase, but if the temperature is raised suddenly, the frog will jump out of the water. He meant that the black majority would pass laws transferring wealth, land, and economic power from white to black slowly and incrementally, until the whites lost all they had gained in South Africa, but without taking too much from them at any given time to cause them to rebel or fight."