Israel's PATHETIC Genocide Defence at the ICJ – Analysis
Israel's PATHETIC Genocide Defence at the ICJ – Analysis
VIDEO: Israel has committed genocide in Gaza: https://youtu.be/FRDyitlHVRA?si=Zs-Ztu2k9RtyY1Wt
Israel tried to defend itself from allegations of potential genocide of Palestinians in Gaza in the ICJ, brought forward by South Africa, and they treated it like a chance to spout the same propaganda they do on Twitter rather than actually contesting…
source
Reviews
0 %
Check out my video making a detailed legal argument that Israel would be found guilty for genocide in Gaza: https://youtu.be/FRDyitlHVRA?si=Zs-Ztu2k9RtyY1Wt
Why don't you shut tf up and let us hear the speakers!…. your opinion is of little interest shut the fk UP!
11:44 did i understand correctly that you would not be against a "counter-genocide" of germans by poles? That would commit you to the view that a genocide can be justified, which is not a very popular view to say the least.
8:55 Want to point out that the Lemkin Institute published a statement calling Israel's war in Gaza a genocide.
Boost
Isnt there propaganda encouraging birth trips by sayibg they feel safe in israel. Excuse me sr. Where is your mouth?
NUMEROUS NATIONS DO NOT ACCEPT ICJ JURISDICTION SO THE RULING MEANS NOTHING TO THEM THOSE INCLUDE USA, RUSSIA GERMANY AND UK
hamas shuffled his papers
Thanks!
Thanks!
you could hear people laughing in the background at the british lawyer, this whole defence makes me want to just move into mountains and live alone.
22:45 if Israel is interested in delivering individual members of Hamas to justice, they could also join the ICC. Something tells me they won’t.
Appreciate the content you’re putting out!keep going
he loses his papers at 1:16:24
26:32 ok so… is hamas failing to protect its ("its") citizens, or are they greedily hoarding aid supplies to only send to their combatants? because by the already ludicrous logic of the isreali legal team, "defence" here does equate to disproportionate military action, so therefore hamas is completely justified in hoarding supplies away from civilians to that end, no?
well, no, because we can already infer what the horrible argument is: it is fine if isreal does it.
So… what was on your hard drives?
The problem is the existence of Israel over 75 years has depended on the ethnic cleansing of Palestine of Palestinians.
But when you have compressed the indiginous people so far as in Gaza and the people have no where to go,, you then choose to kill them. This choice is the flipping from ethnic cleansing by terror to ethnic cleansing by killing. This flipping or removal by force/war to removal of people by extermination is what South Africa needs to show to prove a Zionist pepertrated genocide. The question is about the choice of method of ethnic cleansing. The genocide refers to the method of ethnic cleansing. Palestian resistence or a hostage grab gone wrong as in Oct7 resulting in Israeli civilan casualties by both Hamas and the IDF, are totally irralavant. As is the Nazi Holocaust as the reason for this courts existence, or as is Israels right to defend it's self or is Israel's right to exist. Or whether Israel is an apartheid state or not.
The issue or question before the court is only, Is Israel now commiting genocide.?
Israel knows it has been liberally committing genocide and wishes to continue until the task is complete. Their senior politicians have boasted about this crime spree on live TV more than once. It's well known how they've been treating the Palestinians for decades without a shred of compassion. PSYCHOPATHS!
"Hamas controlled Gaza" said country that controlled Gaza electricity, food, water, and fuel
Go check what happen if you google "ICJ hearing".
If you repeat a lie often enough it eventually becomes Israel.
The terrorist state of Israel and its deranged narcissistic settlers believe they are above the law.
The fact that YouTube giving a information to who's watching that SABC News channel is funded by South Africa is wild bro is like saying that this videos probably being edited or manipulated by South Africa government I've seen that before from al Jazeera news
I'd like to quote Napoleon here: "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
The resistance shuffled his papers 🤣
from the latest statement by Netanyahu, 18 of January 2024:
Putting both Versions of the Translation of the answer to the First Question:
Mitot – מיתות:
Thank you, look, about the Entry of Humanitarian Aid or Minimal Humanitarian Aid, which is what we are supplying, I think there is a clear agreement, this is a necessary condition for the continuation of the fighting, A Humanitarian Collapse, The Spreading of Diseases, Mass Starvation, Deaths umm the Death of Dozens umm will stop the war, anyone understands this. So if you want to achieve the goals of the war, and I am Determined to achieve them, we give the Minimal Aid, and it's Minimal, compared to 1,500 Trucks entering per day, we are talking of a miniscule amount of it. And that's the first thing.
Midot – מידות:
Thank you, look, about the Entry of Humanitarian Aid or Minimal Humanitarian Aid, which is what we are supplying, I think there is a clear agreement, this is a necessary condition for the continuation of the fighting, A Humanitarian Collapse, The Spreading of Diseases, Mass Starvation the Death of Dozens of a Great Size umm will stop the war, anyone understands this. So if you want to achieve the goals of the war, and I am Determined to achieve them, we give the Minimal Aid, and it's Minimal, compared to 1,500 Trucks entering per day, we are talking of a miniscule amount of it. And that's the first thing.
Citing the holocaust as the definition of genocide is like citing 9/11 as the definition of terrorism. If that's the threshold than almost nothing will ever be a real genocide or real terrorism, because a genocide that kills millions of people or a terrorist attack that kills thousands of people is an outlier. Was the Armenian genocide not a genocide because it wasn't as large, systematic, or brutal as the holocaust? If that's the framework it's easy to dismiss genocide of indigenous people, such as the Patagonians or Tasmanians because they were few in number to begin with and killing a thousand people and displacing the rest was effectively destroying them as a people. We would never argue that November 2015 Paris attacks weren't terrorism because only 130 people died. Harming a single person such as a lynching, could be a terrorist attack, it depends on the motivation.
at @1:16:40 it is clear that whoever shuffled his papers was Khamas.
Germany after WW2: We have a robust independent judiciary.
Allies after WW2: You're going to Nuremberg.
SO ISRAHELL WANT'S TO HAVE THIS THROWN OUT ON A TECHNICALITY
It's hilarious how he cites "The IDF is the most moral army in the world, the IDF does everything to avoid harming the uninvolved"… cut to a crowd of IDF soldiers singing by heart "you know our slogan: there are no uninvolved civilians".
Omegalol 🙂
1:33:55 i must say this works well on Israelis, this would have worked on me years ago but not anymore, sadly most of the people i personally know fall for it, they trust the idf so much they are incapable of thinking they would plant evidence, when confronted with this they'll just accuse anyone of antisemitism (in addition to maybe pointing to hypocrisy when western countries do the same and get away with it), it is feasible to move things from place to place, and then present it as though you found it in a different location.
in order for example to show that it was found as it did, the idf would be able to make a case if it had every soldier record the entire investigation, say for example at al shifa if it released raw footage entering it when it was a warzone then proceeding to show footage of them finding weaponry and tunnels (it would be a very long video… several days length probably).
when you take into consideration that the idf has combat soldiers with cameras mounted on them, you start to question why they don't do that
it is particularly annoying to see that they accuse palestinians of faking evidence, faking deaths, lying, etc. but don't even consider that their side may be doing the same…
First of all, the proceeding being led by the US, is equivalent of a serial killer's court being presided by Jeffrey Dahmer! Secondly< r=even if the justice prevails and Israel is convicted of genocide, whose going to enforce the verdict? Big brother US in the UNSC is ready to veto any resolution that condemns Israeli war crimes! That is why Israel keeps still its neighbours' land to expand its colonial settlements, commit war crime against people under its occupation in total impunity!
I will never get tired of hearing them say "khamás" and that's saying something since they use that word at least once a sentence
The Israel defence reminded me of Trump in court, talk about the politics and not the case at hand
The Australia foreign minister released a statement today saying they didnt agree with the premise of the SA case. I wont be voting Labor or Liberal
#securitycouncil is one veto United States
Fucking Zionazis couldnt even go 1 full minute of speaking without invoking the holocaust
Israel's argument is as simple as it is stupid from a legal point of view, but also stupidly clever from a layman's point of view: "There is *A* genocide happening, this court should rule who's doing the genocide, and we say it is the Pal- I mean, Hamas, therefore we have an unrestricted right to do whatever we want to wipe all Palest- I mean, Hamas terrorists off the Earth, because we're the victims of genocide."
They're not treating this as a judicial hearing against them, they're treating this as a court litigation between them and definitively just Hamas, not the entire Palestinian people, they super-promised… (but all palestinians are actually Hamas, come on, we all know it, just look at them).
And I say it's stupidly clever from a layman's point of view because they're directly appealing to the stupidity of the common man: "Forget all complexity, forget that the criminal actions of groups associated with certain ethnic groups doesn't justify genocide, this is just about good guys vs. bad guys, we're the good guys, and we're, like, in one of those action movies that you like, where the good guy is, like, tough but gentle, then suddenly one of those 'ethnic' types (you know, the bad guys) hurt his loved ones, so now he's pissed and he's taking all of them down with extreme prejudice, and all these softies want him to play by the rules, but he doesn't care, because he's a classic action hero. That's what we are."
They didn’t mention the hundreds of Israeli child executions did they. Bloody moaners!
Usa uk israel real terrorists of the world.
Professional gaslighters
the best bit of the defence was the 10 second pause and 'seems as though someone has shuffled my papers"
This guy is seeking for PITY for Israel from the Judge and worldwide. – He should stop killing children
They want to make it as their donations where the convoys clearly have other countries flag on them
You really can't argue or have a discussion with 95 percent of isrealis. You just have to have international observers and apply justice regardless of what they think.
13:40 Quite the self report that he views criticizing Israel's actions in Gaza as delegitimizing the entire state of Israel and "erasing Jewish history".
ISRAEL EVEN WORSER THAN THE NAZIS!!
Israel is guilty for both genocide and holocaust.