Hear what newly released audio reveals about Japan plane crash
Hear what newly released audio reveals about Japan plane crash
Newly released audio from air traffic controllers in Japan reveals officials cleared the passenger jet to land and instructed the Coast Guard plane to hold on the runway prior to the planes colliding. #CNN #News
source
Reviews
0 %
Fake news network.
For a long time now, the capital region has been arranging flights at two airports, Haneda and Narita, so there has been talk about the need to allocate flights to other airports to avoid burdening the area. Then, just as there was talk, an accident occurred in which a JAL aircraft collided with a Japan Coast Guard aircraft. This may have been influenced by the Noto Peninsula earthquake on January 1, but I think it is necessary to have another airport handle emergency support and civilian flights.
I have a hard time discerning the instructions of traffic control in the audio clip – I can see how the Coast Guard pilot could have misunderstood.
I seen the aeroplane on aeroplane radar, 24
Ummmm. The JAL was not cleared to land. C'mon CNN. They were told to continue. Is there more audio where they were indeed were cleared to land? Cleared vs continue are two different instructions.
A stunning example of why The MSM sucks so bad. Who is this idiot reporting?
ATC indicated flight 516 was cleared to continue the approach to 34R, NOT cleared to land???????/ The crew read back cleared to land. Unless you have missed out a transmission from ATC actually clearing the flight to land, this initial statement was NOT. a clearance to land…..!!!
Landing on your instruments. You cant see well out the front of many jets.
When the tower said clear for the approach, Why was the reply clear to land?
I hope the authority can expedite all necessary documents so as to enable the heirs proceed with insurance claim as fast as possible.
Please do not let idiots who nothing about airports and marking report on things like this. There are thousands of people sho know the difference between a runway and a taxiway.
At night with and all the little lights on the ground.. it was probably next to impossible to see that smaller plane from the airliner’s point of view.
Continue approach is not a clear to land
He does know what a plane looks like looking away from you? Not only that but it hard runway lights on and etc. It would be pretty hard to see iy
the air traffic controller cleared JAL to continue the approach. The JAL pilot responded by “cleared to land “. Big difference here
As NTSB investigators always say..there's never a one cause for a disaster, It's always a chain of events that go wrong…
Can we all just take a moment and realize that if this plane was full of Europeans or Americans half of the passengers would not have survived. But 10% of the survivors would have managed to save their hand luggage from the luggage bins 🤯 The Japanese have always impressed me but this time they overdid themselves. 😎🤩
Seems reporter doesn’t understand there is poor visibility at night
Seems coast guard sadly made a mistake
CNN can make a flea bite sound like a snake bite
Only in Japan people can disembark so politely. Admirable!!
The JAL crew couldn’t see the coast guard plane because they can’t see down, only out. Plus it was dark, and the coast guard plane was facing the same direction as the JAL plane. That is its lights we’re facing down the runway. To the JAL pilot they were just more runway lights.
In July of 2017,an Air Canada flight avoided a crash upon landing at the San Francisco international airport because the pilots were able to see other aircrafts line up for take off,how the Japan airlines crew could not see the coast guard plane is something to look into.
It was dark outside. They cannot spot small q400 in all the runway lights.
Based on your video, the tower did NOT clear the airliner to land. Tower only asked JAL to continue the decent towards the runway. JAL seems to have mistaken it as a clearance to land.
The CG plane was 100% in the wrong . Failed to hold on the taxiway