Gotterdammerung – x300 MEGA Nukes and Germany REFUSES To Surrender
Gotterdammerung – x300 MEGA Nukes and Germany REFUSES To Surrender
LAST CHANCE to get a great deal on the new DLC: https://play.heartsofiron.com/FeedBackGaming
❗ STOP ❗ Games on a budget! 💰 Upto 50% off your fav PDX games 🖥️ https://paradoxinteractive.i38e.net/OrGbvn
Support me on PATREON 🌟 http://patreon.com/feedbackgaming
DISCORD talk with me 🗣️…
source
Reviews
0 %
This is a demo advert, you can use simple text, HTML image or any Ad Service JavaScript code. If you're inserting HTML or JS code make sure editor is switched to 'Text' mode.
Grab gotterdammerung wile its cheap!
https://play.heartsofiron.com/FeedBackGaming
The risk of failing the bombing runs were 25% each. Therefore, the risk of failing twice in a row is 6,25% (0,25^2). I'm that guy in the comments
well…nukes are kinda supposed to be broken
Lore of ☢️ Paradox Messed Up NUKES ARE BROKEN! ☢️ momentum 100
WHAT? Am I actually listening your voice on spanish¡?
I really enjoy the new UK focuses. 2 spies (3 with intelligence advisor) is not enough for all majors (excluding spy master) and I think they should all be buffed to have 3 minimum
nice end game stuff, but by 1945 a medium experienced player with Britain would have wiped the floor with Germany. Smaller nations cant take advantage of that as their industry & resources are not geared to do that. Very cool mechanics, shame as you can access them too late to make any substantial difference…
In my UK game I will name my first bomb Fat Chap
The next big expansion i hope focuses on the Common Wealth. Rework of the British Focus Tree. Add the Kingdom of Egypt. Things of that nature. Would also be good to get a Siam tree and probably to finish off SE Asia, a companion tree for Dutch East Indies (like Belgium Congo) & do something with British Malaya.
do nukes contribute to a nations capitulation score now ?
nukes should reduce manpower.
how are they broken if they're less broken at using at divisions then before?
Nazi Germany having an insane stability despite being bombarded with nukes probably makes sense. Historically, they kept fighting long after the point where hope for victory was reasonable grounds for a mental disorder diagnosis. Not sure if the modifiers reflect that for realistic reasons though. Any political party having 100% support in any country doesn't quite make sense, for instance.
The Newcastle project?
Dude I am absolutely digging the christmassy music at 58:00. good job
Is it really WWII anymore?
You decreased the change of the bomb runs to succeed by using high risk. High risk has a fixed 25% chance to critical fail, so if your success chance would be higher it get's capped. Also says that in the tooltip. If you select medium risk your success chance is higher because the fixed critical fail is only 10%, allowing a 90% max success chance.
"what you kinda wanna do is bomb the big ports" , looks what those are , suddenly realises why its historically accurate . to be fair they are probably doing well on the eastern front because after what you done they have nothing to go home too lol
1:29:19 當他笑嘻嘻地用核彈轟炸整個歐洲 ；
各國的間諜們：
The Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch Project!
nuking a state you control 90% of is not really smart. Especially if you have a bunch of your own troops in said state.
Uhmmmm as a Czech….. Why is there a Czechoslovakia AND an independent Slovak Republic??? ( 1:37:53 )
Volvo!!!!! fiiiiiiiiix!!!!!
Bruh I started watching the video and it started reproducing his voice in spanish. It's literally the most attrocious thing I ever heard, is this from Feedback or YT?
Did the video have a name change?
Yorkshire Project for the win
chatgpt recommended this channel, seems alright.
Montebello Project