Egyptian Pharaohs Family Tree | Dynasties 1 to 31

Author Avatar

UsefulCharts

Joined: Apr 2024
Spread the love

Egyptian Pharaohs Family Tree | Dynasties 1 to 31


Get a 7-day free trial and 25% off Blinkist Annual Premium by clicking here:
https://www.blinkist.com/usefulcharts or scanning the QR code.

Buy the Ancient Family Trees chart:
Ancient History Family Trees

Dynasties 1-17…

source

Reviews

0 %

User Score

0 ratings
Rate This

Sharing

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

48 Comments

  1. In Egypt we have found pyramids and temples. Places of worship and buriyal.
    Have we found the dwelling places or cities of these people who made the pyramids and temples? I rarely hear anyone talk about the dwelling places for the people.
    For exmple, we hear about the way the Indus Valley City were constructed. The roads and irrigation system of the cities. I never hear about same information about Egyptian cities and how they were constructed.

  2. I was looking at an image of Akhenaten on YouTube & thought "how weird are those eyes". Since he worshipped the sun I thought his eyes look like he's squinting because of full sunlight.

  3. On the chart you incorrectly have Mursili III in two places … Mursili II should be at 1321-1295 as he was the son of Suppiluliuma I, not Mursili III as you have Mursili III again at 1295- 1272.

  4. I watched your video, made notes, made a bunch of charts explaining the political directoons, believe, innoventions etc etc etc…for my FANTASY story. I could have just made everything up in my comic, but NO, IT NEEDED TO BE ACCURATE. I may hate myself for hyperfocussing, but your video was god damn perfect info delivery!

  5. Lost me at dismissing the theory of an older sphinx. Always, especially when crafting to the public, SHOW why the theory is dismissed. Personally, I think the hydrology theory holds more water 😉and logic than that of the so called scholars. And as you’ve pointed out so astutely, they really don’t know sh*t from Apple butter when pertaining to the old kingdom. And for anyone to take inventory of these times and peoples, to blatantly blow off said contradictions, smacks of snobbery, and is exactly what is wrong with “academics” these days. Humility. Attain and embrace. More people will like you. 🤘🏼✌🏼😒🙄😇🤨🤓

  6. This, literally, is all I watch now. I can't even watch regular TV anymore. Useful Chart videos. I bought most of the posters also! I'm going to buy them all. They hang in my tax office for all my clients to see. They are conversation pieces that''s for sure.

  7. Piramids Tu kuburrr😂😂😂 bukan kubunya/istana raja/the kings's castle 😅,, so di mana istana/kubu firaun sebagai raja??? Agak kelakar semua orang asyik nak bergambar di tepi kubur nya firaun 😂 org biasanya tak bergambar/selfie depan kubur 😂 atau bercakap mengkaji mengenai nya/mengenai kubur

  8. Man , I was watching with my full attention up until you posted that very inaccurate depiction if Tut. It was on the cover of National Geographic & looks nothing like any representations we have of him & even his skull remains. Instead of using his remains correctly they tried to fit skull features like sub nasel prognathism ( the jutting forward of the jaw area ) & a dolichocephalic skull shape into a Euro/middle e. Phenotype, which made it look horribly unnatural & deformed. This had nothing to do with what other illnesses he had , but an apparent attempt to play down his African features. Sub nasel prognathism & dolichocephalic skull shapes are a natural occurrence in Nioletic Africans, but very rare in a European skull. When it is, its looked upon as an abnormality. That created a delimma ( where there shouldn't have been one )so they chose to try & square a circle ( so to speak ) & try to force it to work. Tut was also NEVER shown with an olive skin color but always with a rich brown or reddish brown hue.
    I'm sure you can understand why these inaccuracies are bothersome & tiring, especially to those of Africa descent . If we can portray other civilizations accurately , how come not Egypt? I know there were massive invasions ( besides the early Hyksos) starting with the Assyrians around 670 B.C which ushered in a string of big invasions. This altered the makeup of the people, especially the north, but we know very well what a dominated the old & middle Kingdoms……& again in the 18th dynasty. There's such an abundance of artifacts clearly showing how they saw themselves, that it's pretty inexcusable now .

  9. There is no historical record that describes Canaan later was referred to as "the Land of Israel" stop the rhetoric and mix corrupted religious beliefs and political agendas with Egyptology!

  10. There was no Egypt until Alexander the Great. The rulers before were dark-skinned. I do not understand your lack of frankness or pointed truth. There are black-skinned people in the true sense of the word black (absence of light). Black people as you call them today have always come in different shades of brown. In that sense, they were all black until Alexander the Great and the Ptolemics.

  11. 16:18 The important part is perpendicular to the Nile. It is parallel before that point, but given how often people confuse the two words, I can't give you the benefit of the doubt…

  12. The author is making great efforts but misleading the public about the land id Israel, during the ancient Egyptian history no land known as the land of Israel as now the somerian or Canaanites lands they are polytheistic like the Egyptian with some names og gods Canaan God Baal, shaped like God Seth was worshipped in Eastern delta Egypt, only some indication in ancient Egypt history through king Mernptah, there is staela named mistakenly Israel stela, where depicting and commemorating the victory over over the Hebrew as separated community and describing them as tribes not a s town whichever indicate that their origin is group of tribes and that they have no country

  13. Naming Iuput A the High Priest of Amun and bringing Upper and Lower Egypt together once again was known as the Shoshenq Redemption, was it not?

    …please tell me I’m not the only one to have thought of this obvious joke? Or am I just the only one gauche enough to have said it?

  14. You took on a lot, from 525 BCE non-African rulers controlled Kemet, which became known as Egypt under the Macedonians and Ptolemaic rulers. Then in 642 CE Egypt became the Arabic Misr. So fun fact, Egypt was known a Kemet until 525 BCE.

  15. 1. Egypt is in the Near East, not the Middle East. 2. The portraits you show as what Egyptians may have looked like I believe were of Greeks living in Egypt during the Ptolemaic Era. 3. Egyptian rulers needed a royal wife to be a legitimate sovereign, so they married their relatives. 4. You are so right about race conversation in ancient times—they weren’t like the Modern West at all. And, if you go to Egypt today, you’ll see people of every ilk represented and cherished by their amazing society. For thousands of years, people have been drawn to Egypt and it really can be considered the center of the world for thousands of years.

  16. Amenhotep II 1446 Exodus! You have to loop who made treaties & marriages outside…It shows their weakness caused by the loss of the great army in the red sea & the wealth of egypt going out with the israelites. they paid them to go…they wqnted the plagues to end. imagine how many FIRSTBORNS died! animal & mankind.

  17. Except The Hyksos are not of the same progenitor. The Hyksos I believe are being linked to Hittites or Hurrians…Not orrrr ASSYRIAN descendants who had been in Canaan. Canaan was the son of Ham. Abraham, Isaac, & JACOB/Israel were descendants of Shem through Terah. Assyria from Assur were semetic from a different line of shem.

  18. The more data that is coming out PROVING BIBLICAL HISTORACITY the more the timeframe is CORRECTED & the more we know about what really happened. Sometimes the EXPERTS only know what their EDUCATION has taught them. They need to be open to change because they havent PROVEN anything; only theorized.

  19. The "experts" are those that want to stick with a chronology that was based on the CORRUPTED Biblical chronology. The is thanks to the Pharisees aka RABBIS of post JESUS TIMEFRAME. They attempted to "erase" anything that could point to the MESSIAH prophesied by GOD…They had their idea of what their messiah would be. It wasnt a divine being that would take power from them.