Eei I'll not apologize but face Otumfuo with Evidence against the Chiefs_ Maurice Ampaw fires back

2 Comments

1. Maurice Ampaw, you speak of the principle of fair hearing. Unfortunately you did not apply that principle to the chiefs you accuse and lambast in your personal cases.. You mentioned two grievances against chiefs. First a chief attempted to befriend your girlfriend or your wife. In the other case a chief defrauded you. You have the right to make a case against those chiefs before the competent court of jurisdiction. You may have a rough time with the chiefs, but it is unjust on your part to label chiefs as fraudsters and womanizers, when you are dealing with specific chiefs on a particular issue. You claim that Kumasi traditional chiefs had already condemned you. You don't seem to understand how the traditional authorities operate. You attack the chefs were made on social media to demean the chiefs and ridicule them in public. Your action was an attack on the traditional institutions who maintain peace and public order. Attack on the chiefs is an attack against the society. As it is the custom of the traditional system chiefs in sitting are invited to express their views before they come to a conclusion. In your case, Maurice Ampaw, the chiefs at Manhyia Palace deliberated to evaluate your statements to determine whether they were serious enough to deserve an invitation to Manhyia. This is normal because, even at civil court when a complaint is made the court has to determine whether it deserves to be heard. It is not a judgement of the case but but a judgement to determine if the case deserved to be heard. That is why a chief said he did not know what type of lawyer you are because this is not unusual.

   Reply

2. Such a useless lawyer spewing gibberish

   Reply