Bill on Open Grazing Divides Senators, Scales Second Reading
Bill on Open Grazing Divides Senators, Scales Second Reading
Don’t forget to subscribe: https://bit.ly/2Hb8hjx
Watch more interesting videos: https://bit.ly/34ogCaw
Follow Channels Television On:
https://www.facebook.com/channelsforum
https://www.instagram.com/channelstelevision
Get more news on our website: https://www.channelstv.com/
#ChannelsTv #newsupdate #news…
source
Reviews
0 %
If open grazing will be ban, then economy migration should be banned also..
No open grazing
Build a ranch because people farm and crops are gone in the name of grazing
Follow the step Ghanaian did
This northerners are really not serious and insensitive to their people. Sincerely.
So, Senator Aberibe of Abia thinks it is right to abolish law that makes land to be in charge of state. Aberibe's bill must NOT stand. Every land must continue to belong to state and not to federal government. If the FG owned land, Buhari would given Fulani RUGA in all the 36 states. What is Aberibe's motive?
Let d herders take their cows to d north where they have plenty of lands to avoid this killings
Ban on open grazing included in the bill is given land to Fulani terrorists in every state. Evil bill and evil senators.
Biafrans freedom is not negotiable, we must continue until BIAFRA is restored ✊️
A cow is a property and it should not infringe on another man's property unless consent is given.
Cows are not citizens ❤❤❤
Open grazing must be ban.
Instead discussing on how to break up for us to go our separate ways knowing fully well that the country cannot stand as one, they are still talking about these fulani herdsmen and their cows as if they are the only problem facing the country.
you law makers should go home 🏡 you've nothing else to say see corruption, state police, lga autonomy, unemployment, hunger, poverty in the land you're there talking about ranching you all should go 🚶♂️ home be on minimum wage
(1). This, like other similar daily occuring destructive and spine- chilling act is a sorry-sight to behold.
(2). This is not how to either develop and grow this economic sector or to de-escalate the blood-letting tension between the pastoralists and the farmers/ host communities.
(3). The sustainable approach should be for the government to force the pastoralists ( using cane and carrot means simultaneously/ and or interchangeably) to build ranches in order to keep and feed their livestocks therein, and for the farmers to farm in peace and to supply the pastoralists with animal feeds( grasses in silage form) for cost/fees as obtainable in many countries.
(4). This will mitigate these bloody encounters on one- hand, and also assist in expanding the value-chain that is inherent in this sector.
(5). By so doing, the plants, crops and grasses in the farms will become things of commercial value to the farmers/landowners just as the livestocks are article of commerce to the pastoralists. Therefrom, a win-win situation will emerge to safe-guard the common-interest of all the players.
(6). To side-step this world-class approach in favour of the status quo will be a reinforcement of these blood-bathing situations.
* Politicians and policy- makers should be put on notice.
{7). The idea of grazing tracks/lanes is ancient and days-gone. It will never assuage the concerns of these players( i.e. farmers and pastoralists). In synopsis, an all- encompassing approach that will be rooted in pure mercantilism will be a commonwealth for all.