Battle of Merv, 484 AD – Attila of the East – Greatest Hunnic Conqueror?

Author Avatar

HistoryMarche

Joined: Apr 2024
Spread the love


Battle of Merv, 484 AD – Attila of the East – Greatest Hunnic Conqueror?


🥏 Visit https://80000hours.org/historymarche and start planning a career that is meaningful, fulfilling, and helps solve one of the world’s most pressing problems. Make your 80,000 hours count.

🚩 Support HistoryMarche on Patreon and get ad-free early access to our videos for as little as $1: https://www.patreon.com/historymarche

📢…

source

Reviews

0 %

User Score

0 ratings
Rate This

Sharing

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

23 Comments

  1. Sukhra beat the best king of Hephthalites Empire Khushnavaz is the same king that beat Peroz but Sukhra beat him in bad way forcing Khushnavaz sued for peace, which Sukhra would only accept if he would give him everything Khushnavaz had seized from Peroz I's camp, which included his treasuries, the chief priest (mowbed) of the empire, and his daughter Perozdukht. Khushnavaz accepted his demands, and peace was made Sukhra made the best king of Hephthalites Empire and the Hephthalites Empire look like joke

  2. The Hephthalites (Bactrian: ηβοδαλο, romanized: Ebodalo),[11] sometimes called the White Huns (also known as the White Hunas, in Iranian as the Spet Xyon and in Sanskrit as the Sveta-huna),[12][13] were a people who lived in Central Asia during the 5th to 8th centuries CE, part of the larger group of the Iranian Huns.[14][15] They formed an empire, the Imperial Hephthalites, and were militarily important from 450 CE, when they defeated the Kidarites, to 560 CE, when combined forces from the First Turkic Khaganate and the Sasanian Empire defeated them.[1][16]

  3. There are some mistakes one is that the army of hephtolits have better technology which is false second Sassanid empire wasn't a vasel of hephtolits he just pay tribute to them