American mercenaries hired by UAE to kill in Yemen | BBC News

Author Avatar

BBC News

Joined: Mar 2024
Spread the love

American mercenaries hired by UAE to kill in Yemen | BBC News


American mercenaries, hired by the UAE to kill in Yemen, have spoken candidly on camera for the first time in an investigation by BBC Arabic.

At a time when Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping have highlighted the international dimensions of the Yemeni conflict, the investigation also reveals how US mercenaries trained Emirati officers to kill…

source

Reviews

0 %

User Score

0 ratings
Rate This

Sharing

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

32 Comments

  1. BBC doing marketing for muppets like this private company now? Thats the only reason he's talking and he knows its safe to say what he's saying because he's talking crap.

  2. Its strange, and disturbing, that a Brtish Media service ;like the BBC, seems to be all the time on the side of ugly terrorists, instead of those brave souls who fight them.

  3. The mercenary should go home or better still protect and feed the innocent in Yemen give the money back to the UAE, fight for compassion instead in this brutal world, wake up to change… in the name of our concience which knows what's right and wrong by instinct. Imagine…a Peacekeeping Army with no guns, feed the poor and bring forgiveness where there is hatred. Hearts that have turned violent and insane with revenge can be made to change if they witness goodness instead of more killing killing killing. Organise a football match in Yemen, how about that? Balls not bullits!!!

  4. The line of question "you trained them, them trained these, these then killed people." that was a statement, and just by using common sense and logic its flawed.
    Exampel: Glock makes pistols, pistols involved in murders and taking of life in general. Are glock responsible? No.

    Bear grylls has a brand of knifes, if said knife was involved in a stabbing, its Bears fault?

    Them training a group of individuals who then decides to train someone else isnt on Spear.
    When you went that line of thinking and the angle you had on it, made me just pause, comment and exit. You are relying on peoples flawed logic and lack of common sense here. They are responsible for the direct actions they made, YES. But training a 2nd party who then trains a 3rd party, you see them as even more responsible? Thats not journalism.

    The list question wasnt even that good either.. You had all the time in the world to set traps with it, use it to draw out information that would further the conversation into deeper corners.
    To much speculation and very little proof. "seemed delibirate, no crossfire etc." – spoken by the mother. I mean, speculative at best. Weres the proof? an eyewitness say so? Grounds for them to NOT point at a group of "masked mercenaries? Why would they point out yemen national as the shooter, what do they gain from it..

    I know journalism done right is hard, finding evidence and so on. But publish something without it, based on speculation and very poor phrased question might fool the masses.

    Do this again, and this time, dig deeper, do better. And publish the TRUTH backed with evidence, not just thoughts and feelings.

  5. This man is a terrorist. The thing is these guys just justify their killings in their minds to make themselves feel comfortable for killing. But they are terrorists for sure don't let the mercenary title fool you

  6. Lies! The Trump administration classified the muslim brotherhood as a terrorist organization, as soon as Biden took office he lessened the classification! And recently upgraded back to original. C'mon do you research and stop lieing!

  7. these are the guys the government (read: US government) hires to kill political rivals or others they see as a threat. the documentary "the octopus murders" comes to mind. obviously it wasn't these guys due to when that journalist was killed, but i'm sure it was a similar group with similar ideologies